Andrew Clem home
Andrew Clem banner

Blog post

Monthly archives
(all categories)

February 6, 2007 [LINK / comment]

More on global warming

In today's Washington Post, Anne Applebaum has some refreshingly sensible words about the recent global warming conference. She grants, as I do, that global warming is a serious problem, and she praises Europeans for recognizing this.

The question now is whether these same Europeans will start taking the solutions seriously. If so, they must begin by abandoning the bankrupt Kyoto treaty on climate change and encouraging the United States to do so, too.

Exactamundo. For some unfathomable reason, very few people seem to grasp how irrational Kyoto's emissions ceilings are, or how stupid it is to grant special exemptions on greenhouse gas emissions to countries like India and China on the grounds that they are poor and underdeveloped, when they are driving U.S. industries out of business already! Applebaum calls for a simple solution that will yield positive side-effects in terms of revenue: a carbon tax. That's what I've been saying!

Writing for, Dr. Timothy Ball spells out "The Cold, Hard Facts" on global warming. (Hat tip to Barcepundit.) He claims:

Global warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This in fact is the greatest deception in the history of science.

This just goes to show that disagreements among scientists are a normal occurrence, and the matter is not definitively resolved. As the author states, "consensus is not a scientific fact." He also makes a valid point that many universities these days -- especially ones that depend on public money -- are becoming bastions of dogma. I was also quite pleased that he cited Thomas Kuhn, author of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions; that's one of my favorite works. I have a hard time believing, however, that the world scientific community could be engaged in such large-scale deception. (One can't help wondering, moreover, if it might be in Canada's own interest to promote global warming.)

Apple vs. Apple: It's over

Apple After a quarter of a century, Apple, Inc., formerly known as Apple Computer, Inc., has reached a settlement over the use of the "Apple" trademark and name with Apple Corps, the Beatles' record company. This may facilitate making Beatles songs available for purchase at the Apple Music Store. (The second 45 RPM vinyl record I ever bought was "Hey Jude / Revolution," back in 1968, and I vividly remember the green apple label.) The dispute first arose in 1980, when Apple was still an upstart home computer company. Apple Computer agreed to stay out of the music business, but of course that commitment went out the window when iTunes and the iPod came out. See BBC and I wonder if last month's decision to drop "Computer" from Apple, Inc.'s name was prompted by anticipation of the resolution of this dispute? I also wonder if the deal may have been motivated by Apple's desire to protect itself from certain European governments who want to dismantle the Digital Rights Management (DRM) system that binds the iPod to iTunes, preventing unauthorized copying.

UPDATE: Steve Jobs' "thoughts on music" are quite relevant and well worth reading. If Apple gives up its proprietary DRM (called "called FairPlay"), there is no way it can guarantee to recording companies that the licenses they grant will be protected. He notes that Microsoft ("Zune") and Sony have their own proprietary DRM systems. If Apple were to give in to the demands, it would unleash a tidal wave of digital theft. Jobs observes:

Its [sic] hard to believe that just 3% of the music on the average iPod [that is purhcased from iTunes] is enough to lock users into buying only iPods in the future. And since 97% of the music on the average iPod was not purchased from the iTunes store, iPod users are clearly not locked into the iTunes store to acquire their music.

Posted (or last updated or commented upon): 06 Feb 2007, 11: 26 PM

(unformatted URL)

This post is over a week old, so comments are closed.

© Andrew G. Clem. All rights reserved. Your use of this material signifies your acceptance of the Terms of use.

Hits on this page (single blog post) since July 2, 2007:

Category archives:
(all years)

This (or that) year's
blog highlights

NOTE: Thus far, only blog posts related to politics and baseball are included in this list.

Blog highlights have been compiled for the years 2010-2012 thus far, and eventually will be compiled for earlier years, back to 2002.


The "home made" blog organization system that I created was instituted on November 1, 2004, followed by several functional enhancements in subsequent years. I make no more than one blog post per day on any one category, so some posts may cover multiple news items or issues. Blog posts appear in the following (reverse alphabetical) order, which may differ from the chronological order in which the posts were originally made:

  1. Wild birds (LAST)
  2. War
  3. Science & Technology
  4. Politics
  5. Latin America
  6. Culture & Travel
  7. Canaries ("Home birds")
  8. Baseball (FIRST)