Andrew Clem home
Andrew Clem banner

Blog post

Monthly archives
(all categories)

December 7, 2005 [LINK]

Baseball at Pearl Harbor!

Serendipity, random happenstance, or "Intelligent Design"? You be the judge! Just in time to commemorate the 64th anniversary of the infamous sneak attack by Japan, I have just completed the diagrams for Aloha Stadium, which is located right next to Pearl Harbor. It is the first all-new stadium page since September (that being Estadio Monterrey). Most Americans know Aloha Stadium as the site of the Pro Bowl, but it also served as a "neutral" venue of a series between the Padres and the Cardinals in April 1997. Of all the football-baseball "hybrid" stadiums, it had perhaps the most radical reconfiguration scheme. Whether there was much point to building such a big stadium for baseball in Hawaii is another question.

Reminder on diagram usage: ©!

It has been brought to my attention that some people have copied, modified, and distributed some of my stadium diagrams without requesting permission, and without crediting me. Obviously, that is a violation of the Terms of use of this Web site*, besides being just plain scummy. (How could a person doing such a rip-off even look himself in the mirror??) It is also, more than likely, against the law. In this Digital Era in which music is being ripped off on a massive scale, it is common to hear "everybody does it," but few judges buy that line. To reiterate, I put a high priority on respect for the intellectual property rights of others, and I expect full reciprocity in that regard from everyone who visits this Web site, at least 99 percent of which is original material. I reserve all rights for the graphic, video, audio, and text content on this Web site that I authored. Photographs or other material submitted to me by other persons are not covered by this claim, of course. Some folks who keep in regular touch with me have sent me modified versions of diagrams that I did, and I appreciated being told. As long as any downloading you do is for strictly private use (e.g., not posted on some Web site, and not trying to make money off my work), and as long as you let me know about it in a timely fashion, I generally don't mind. Commercial licensing? Make me an offer. Those who are not willing to abide by these quite reasonable ground rules should not visit this site.

* Please read the newly revised Terms of use page.

$700 million! (Do I hear $800 million?)

Tuesday's Washington Post reported that the newest estimates put the new stadium's total cost as high as $714 million. That seems a little steep even to me, but it's not out of the question. Part of the problem is whether to include infrastructure and neighborhood improvements such as new sidewalks, lighting, and parking garages. This points out something I learned when taking graduate economics courses at American University: When doing a cost-benefit analysis for some proposed development project, there is simply no foolproof way to objectively identify which entities should be included or excluded from the analysis. Estimating the spinoff effects of a stadium, or a fishmeal processing plant near Lima Peru, is inherently a risky judgment call, which is why it's usually better to let self-interested, risk-assuming entrepreneurs run commercial development projects than politicians who couldn't care less about the bottom line. Speaking of which, in my opinion, the disingenuous bargaining tactics employed by the D.C. Council have created a cynical atmosphere around this projects, making it more likely that all sort of corrupt kickback schemes are going to emerge. The folks at are having a "field day" with this latest flap. It's a good thing that there are plenty of accounting scrutinizers to prevent all the greedy hogs from devouring all the public money they can.

I've had a very sober view of this stadium-funding process (and the related franchise-relocation process) all along, and I do not discount the possibility that further legal tangles may put the construction on hold, perhaps for many months. (No problema: We've got RFK!) That's what happened in San Diego, you may remember. PETCO Park was delayed by two years because of bond issue referendum controversies and whatnot. That is another city that has long been plagued by corruption in government, by the way.

Posted (or last updated or commented upon): 07 Dec 2005, 11: 53 PM

(unformatted URL)

This post is over a week old, so comments are closed.

© Andrew G. Clem. All rights reserved. Your use of this material signifies your acceptance of the Terms of use.

Hits on this page (single blog post) since July 2, 2007:

Category archives:
(all years)

This (or that) year's
blog highlights

Blog highlights have been compiled for the years 2010-2012 thus far, and eventually will be compiled for earlier years, back to 2002.


The "home made" blog organization system that I created was instituted on November 1, 2004, followed by several functional enhancements in subsequent years. I make no more than one blog post per day on any one category, so some posts may cover multiple news items or issues. Blog posts appear in the following (reverse alphabetical) order, which may differ from the chronological order in which the posts were originally made:

  1. Wild birds (LAST)
  2. War
  3. Science & Technology
  4. Politics
  5. Latin America
  6. Culture & Travel
  7. Canaries ("Home birds")
  8. Baseball (FIRST)